Salut/Hi Tim Hutzler!
CM>Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems you're calling a
CM>label instead of a procedure the way it's written.
TH> Sure. In assembly that's the way it would be done.
Well if you're calling a subroutine, you dont jump to it like
when you straight to a label, that's what I meant... Jumping to a
label it's like a GOTO in Basic and calling a subroutine it's
similar call to GOSUB in Basic, which is not the same...
CM>If MyLabel was meant to be a procedure,...
TH> In assembly parlace, it would be called a "subroutine"...
So that means you understand what I meant! :) You're right about
that, I normally speak in french, so I can miscall a term sometime,
but I think procedure is not bad term cause when you right assembly
you write like:
Test Proc Near
Mov ah,9
Mov bl,10
Test Endp
"Proc", it means what it means, doesn't it!
CM>what I suppose is the case since you're calling MyLabel instead of
CM>jumping to it, then write it as a normal C procedure containing
CM>the assembly lines like this:
TH> Oh, don't make it too easy, Carlo. [grin]
Sorry... :)
See ya! Happy New Year 98!
--- GEcho 1.11+
---------------
* Origin: -=[ POPA SBE // Ste-Therese // 430-0251 * 430-1524 ]=- (1:242/801)
|