TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nthelp
to: Rich
from: Geo
date: 2005-03-09 22:18:24
subject: Re: E-mail

From: "Geo" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C524F5.E97280B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Secure email is like secure telephone, its the phone not the system that =
is secure. In other words you can put an encryption device on a phone = and
make a "secure" phone call but the phone system itself is not =
secure. So when speaking about an email server it's stupid to use the =
term "secure" since it's part of an insecure system. You can have
secure = email without the server (pgp).

On the "running separately" comment, I mean you can run a group
calender = or share folders or LDAP on a machine that is separate from the
mail = server. Since the mail server must talk to other external machines
it = seems to me that keeping it as clean and simple as possible is a more
= secure way to do things.

Geo.
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:422f2a9c{at}w3.nls.net...
     Secure in this context means a secure channel.  You can provide =
email access without exposing your whole email infrastructure to the =
Internet.  Someone using this would not be safe from you sending a = stupid
email.  I didn't touch on content filtering.

     All of the things I mentioned are part of the "critical =
communications channel" as you call it.  What do you mean by
"running = them separately"?

  Rich

------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C524F5.E97280B0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








Secure email is like secure telephone, =
its the=20
phone not the system that is secure. In other words you can put an = encryption=20
device on a phone and make a "secure" phone call but the phone
system = itself is=20
not secure. So when speaking about an email server it's stupid to use = the term=20
"secure" since it's part of an insecure system. You can have
secure = email=20
without the server (pgp).
 
On the "running
separately" comment, I =
mean you can=20
run a group calender or share folders or LDAP on a machine that is
= separate=20
from the mail server. Since the mail server must talk to other external = machines=20
it seems to me that keeping it as clean and simple as possible is a more = secure=20
way to do things.
 
Geo.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:422f2a9c{at}w3.nls.net... Secure in this context = means a=20 secure channel. You can provide email access without exposing = your whole=20 email infrastructure to the Internet. Someone using this would = not be=20 safe from you sending a stupid email. I didn't touch on content=20 filtering. All of the things I = mentioned are=20 part of the "critical communications channel" as you call it. = What do=20 you mean by "running them separately"? Rich ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C524F5.E97280B0-- --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.