| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | PNU 729 |
GK> Not neccessarily sloppy. As I said above: Photons having an GK> energy of 10000 cm^-1 are correct and understandable in a GK> spectroscopic context. The inverse centimeter is NOT a unit of energy. It's a unit of something known as the wave number. For example, 10 000 cm^-1 means that there are 10 000 waves in a centimeter. While this number certainly is proportional to the energy for two waves with the same wave speed, it is not a measure of the energy. I know for a fact that researchers who routinely work in units of wavenumbers THINK of the wavenumber as an indicator of the amount of energy. They can get away with that because it works for them in that one specialized area. When these researchers publish their work, they do not use the wavenumber as a measure of energy. ---* Origin: Big Bang (1:106/2000.7) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.