HI MIchael,

Michael Kleefeld wrote in a message to Richard Webb:

 MK>> The fourth is on way to you.


 RW> IF it hostroutes there may be some delays, as my nc and I don't have
 RW> direct connections, he's pots only. I think Janis pulls off netmails
 RW> addressed to my system though as I poll her daily.

LEt me correct that, I'm pots only he's internet only.
Netmails that are host routed sometimes take days from his system to mine
for some reason. don't know what the story is there.

MK> The ping-netmail is routed 'normal'. Having also pots only, but with
MK> phone flatrate, so mail goes and comes fast.

I have flat rate and am pots only, route everything either through primary
uplink or zc1.

 RW>> IF it meets specs then I'll change my listing. If not, oh well .
 MK>> I think i will list a PING-flag on the coordinator line.

 RW> A good thing.  WE'll see how it works.

MK> I just now set up the segment to get ping-flag with next nodediff. 

MK> [mail 2]

Great!  May be two of us soon.

Saw one other z1 system flying ping flag and sent a netmail to it, nothing back yet.

 RW> It's set up now and debug says all's well with it, so w'ellsee how
 RW> it works.

MK> Anything seen in the meantime?

Haven't seen anything yet, and a day later, so as soon as it shows up we'll
see how it looks from your end.

MK> From : Michael Kleefeld                    2:2468/1       
MK> 13.04.2008 17:21:48 To   : ping                               
MK> 1:116/901       13.04.2008 17:21:48 
I see your timestamp on that is 14:21:48, if that's universal time nothing
as of next day at 23:41 universal.


Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+