CH>  GP> Didn't you say you liked art that represents things (eg. landscape)?
CH>
CH>  Represent? Not as in fake, but to replicate ? YES! Espeically
CH> Impressionism and um... last time I SAW you did'nt need to hear.

Are you still missing the point of the contest?
Which was to somehow REPRESENT/REPLICATE some symbolism/etc. to convey
non-hearing to people through art. . .

CH> But let me state this again for the record that I know realize the
CH> whole thing was to do what OUGHT to be a foregone conclusion. Get the
CH> truly "disabled" to realize even deaf people can do art.

How'd you get so far off the page?

CH>  GP> Beach-theme art represents beaches
CH>
CH>  Visual is respresenative and I don't know why we're having another of
CH> our famous word warz ...

Because you're still missing thi point that they were to represent deafness,
not highlight that deaf people have skills like painting, too!  (that's a
bloody GIVEN!)

CH>  GP> Sounds like a good challenge for people -- to find a way to visually
CH>  GP> represent deafness in such a way as to make sense. . .
CH>
CH>
CH>  Deafness is not a visaul representation unless you want to visualize
CH> a deaf person sitting amid chatting family members ignoringher but she bett
CH> not pout about it or go entertain hereslf elsewhere.... lest she upset
CH> them with THEIR discomfort.

And thus the challenge, to interpret deafness so as to convey the concept
visually!

Because I care,
|<+]::-)  (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))

... nfx v3.1                                                                 
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32