Hi Scott, as you were just saying about Commandeering = CarJack....
SM> Or, (as has been the case, especially with Cleveland PD) I come to
SM>  your department and say "I've just witnessed someone taking a child",
SM>  or, "I saw a car being stolen", do you honestly believe that the 'Sworn
SM>  LEO' would go right after the person, in the first situation they
SM>  would, the second they would not, at least immediately.
SM> 
SM>  It would go something like this; (while still at the department)
SM> 
SM>  1. Did you see what they were wearing?
SM>  2. What direction were they traveling?
SM>  3. Were they in a vehicle, if so, what color, make, and model is it?
SM>  4. How many people were in sight?
SM>  5. Was there another vehicle seen?
SM> 
SM>  This has occurred more times than I care to imagine, and most likely is
SM>  wide spread because *some* officers and departments simply do not care
SM>  because "they're lazy", if it is not important enough to them to
SM>  pursue, or if there is not a life in peril, they will not act. Or, if
SM>  they do, it won't be in a timely fashion.
Perhaps it could also be because Motorolas are much faster than Fords,
Chevys or Mopars. 
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com 
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
A well-educated Congress being necessary for the governing of a free
state, the right of the people to read and write books shall not be
infringed.
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X I do believe the cheese has slipped off your cracker.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------