Hi Scott, as you were just saying about "Setting the Record"....
SM>  I've take such an oath myself as a notary, and even though I am
SM> NOT
SM>  sworn to enforce laws, I take that oath extremely seriously because I
SM>  legally represent the court as such.
SM> 
SM>  Obviously I can't know for an absolute if the person who appeared
SM>  before me told the absolute truth, but I've notarized a document and
SM>  such document contains my signature, or in most cases, has my name
SM>  stamped on it and is sealed, I've personally stated "I attest that the
SM>  information contained herewith is accurate", therefore I am responsible
SM>  *to an extent* for the accuracy of such information.  As is the case
SM>  with Sworn Law Enforcement Personnel.
Hmmmm, interesting.  Both my wife and I have been notaries in two
different states and our notarie stamps and signatures on a statement
only indicated that proper identification was presented by the
signer(s) that showed he/she (they) was (were) who  they claimed to be.
 We were notarizing the validity of the signature(s), *not* the
accuracy of the document to which it was affixed. 
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com 
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
A well-educated Congress being necessary for the governing of a free
state, the right of the people to read and write books shall not be
infringed.
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------