O
>
> >>> True.  For the record, it didn't bother me so much what
Jerry does himself
> >>> with regard to his scripts; what bothered me was how
dismissive he was of
> >>> Michael O'Hare's (very different) style.
>
> > I tink most people can differentiate between a difference is style and
> > a lack of mental competence. How many times wuld you have to be told
> > there was no "code" to stop asking? Doyle went as far to say that
> > O'Hare thought EVERYTHING meant something else. There's a name for
> > that -- several in fact -- in the DSM-IV. <<
>
> That's not what you said in your OP (that he asked *repeatedly* about a code,
> was *told* repeatedly there was no code, but that he kept asking).  Is that
> what you're asserting now?  Why would you necessarily believe that?  Why
> wouldn't you assume it was just someone who didn't like him, didn't like his
> style, and who isn't very diplomatic or even *nice* just gossipping
> offhandedly?  
Mainly  (a)  cuz otherwise, Doyle is as gushy as the rest of the cast
about how wonderful the B5 culture was, and (b) there is  near-
complete lack of cinematic, theatrical or television credits for
O'Hare afterwords, and (c) because of JMS's near utter silence about
the entire matter of O'Hare's departure (in contrast, for example,
with his utter frankness about Claudia C., a circumstance in which he
was wronged). . I would expect JMS to be very discrete in a case like
O'Hare's (as described by Doyle), that's just the sort of person he
seems to me to be.
Nonetheless I admit it's all circumstantial, and since no one has any
additional information about the matter (which is what I was wondering
in the first place), that's about all from me on this.
- Joe C
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32