Deborah Gibson gave up a long homer to Otis Nixon and said:
 DG> Anderson would've been at least half-way smart.. He'll never hit 50 in a
Home runs have nothing to do with what I'm talking about. He would have given 
Atlanta a solid outfield defensively and put Klesko where he belonged - first 
base.
 DG> the Dodgers don't lack talent, they lack intangibles. Like chemistry and
 DG> determination and toughness.
I'll tell you the same thing I tell everyone else -- chemistry is a class and 
has nothing to do with winning. *Professionals* go out and play and they 
don't worry too much about what happens around them (Which is why the Bulls 
have won the last two championships despite the so-called distractions). The 
Dodgers have been a bunch of head cases who lose despite their talent. Let's 
not forget that around the All-Star break that the Dodgers were making 
excuses about the lack of chemistry in their multi-cultural clubhouse and 
yet, that same bunch managed to make a run late in the season. There was no 
more chemistry by the end of the season as there was at the beginning except 
the fact that they were winning.
--- TrekEd 1.00
---------------