Hi! Robert,
On 13 May 18 12:12, you wrote to me:
PQ>> If you ever want to use the shortened form of "it is"
PQ>> then you may use "it's".
RB> Apparently the language has changed since I lived in the States. It
RB> used to be that an apostrophe "s" was used as a posessive. And when a
RB> word ended in "s", a simple apostrophe at the end denoted the
RB> posessive.
Yes, you are correct for the majority of its usage. Look, I am not an expert
but its misuse is one of those things that grates on the nerves like dragging a
fistful of fingernails across a chalkboard. In the case of 'it', which may be
a unique case or may represent a class of exceptions - I don't know, through
its specialness makes it easy to remember.
PQ>> The other form "its" is the possessive form of the word "it".
PQ>> It's really quite simple.
RB> I agree. Or is this a difference between Australian and American
RB> English?
I doubt it. You are welcome to test the notion with any English Dictionary
that answers your call, beit to hand or online.
Cheers,
Paul.
... It's Monday!?! I want a recount.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130515
* Origin: Quinn's Rock - Live from Paul's Xubuntu desktop! (3:640/1384)
|