From: Ellen K. 

I've been in ILOG training all week and I got a HUGE memory leak on my
machine today, had to reboot.  The same thing has happened to two other
participants.

On Tue, 17 May 2005 19:16:34 +0100, Adam Flinton
 wrote in message :

>Paul Ranson wrote:
>> I don't see any point in being different for the sake of it. And both Java
>> and C# seem to be jumping through hoops to avoid doing destructors the easy
>> way, which means code written in either that needs to manage object
>> lifetimes is more convoluted and error prone than it need be. I think the
>> work being done on C++ for .NET is pretty interesting, even if it's of no
>> use to me personally at the moment.
>>
>
>Why on earth you want underpressure tired etc programmers time after
>time having to do their own memory management is beyond me.
>
>Hello memleak my old friend,
>It's time to bring down the system again...
>
>Adam
>
>> Paul
>>
>> "Adam"  wrote in message
>> news:428a0467{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>>Paul Ranson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>This isn't the case.
>>>>
>>>>.NET is analagous to Java, it's a library and an environment for
>>>>applications. It's a better design than Java, if only
because it didn't
>>>>have to repeat the same mistakes and it supports C++, but I
don't really
>>>>see the point of either. Anyway the MS development tools allow you to
>>>>target .NET or native with C or C++.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Chuckle
>>>
>>>"if only because it didn't have to repeat the same mistakes and it
>>>supports C++"
>>>
>>>Not that you're biased in favour of C++ or anything 
>>>
>>>Adam
>>
>>
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5