From: "Peter Sawatzki" 

Geo,

but the problem is if there were basically two patches issued for the
product and they do what you request - re-release a slipstreamed base
version - there is additonal QA effort necessary to test this version. It
is not nice this way but it works (I just had to go through the steps you
mentioned for a fresh test install myself).

Peter

Geo wrote:

> the difference for me is does it tell you? For example I installed the
> current version of frontpage on a machine today, after the install it
> asked if I wanted to check for patches, told it sure. It downloaded a
> patch, applied it, then asked if I wanted to check for more patches,
> told it sure again. It downloaded more patches then didn't ask if I
> wanted to check again, so I checked anyway and there were no more
> patches.
>
> That's better, I can live with that even if it's silly in that I
> already answered once that I wanted the patches so it never should
> have needed to ask the second time.
>
> Geo.
>
> "Peter Sawatzki"  wrote in message
> news:428b8cef$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Oh, btw. F-Secure 2005 (7MB download) required a 40 MB additonal
> > download during install, a reboot, a hotfix, a reboot, a hotfix and
> > a reboot.
> >
> > Peter

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5