From: "Geo" 

"Peter Sawatzki"  wrote in message
news:428cc48c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Geo,
>
> but the problem is if there were basically two patches issued for the
> product and they do what you request - re-release a slipstreamed base
> version - there is additonal QA effort necessary to test this version.
> It is not nice this way but it works (I just had to go through the
> steps you mentioned for a fresh test install myself).

Why is there a QA effort, if they can recommend end users practice
slipstreaming then certainly MS should be able to handle it. You know, save
all those users from having to each do the same QA effort?

Look at it this way, a million users can spend 10 minutes each or MS can
spend 2 days, which is less work?

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5