I hub CyberNet in Mystic and also hub a Fidonet server in Mystic.

On 11:34 29/09 , g00r00 wrote:
> RS> Ok I returned the netmail to separate areas ie each network has a set
> RS> node addy in netmail area (it used to work all as one)  Mystic bbs for
>
>There may still be some confusion here.  The instructions I was giving were to
>solve the missing address on the origin line.  There was not talk about trying
>to create multiple Netmail bases per network (?) so you lost me there! :)
>
>The issue with the missing addressing on the origin line is because those
>people have their Netmail base address set as follows:
>
>"Net Address: 0:0/0 (Local Network)"
>
>That is why the addressing was not on the Origin line, because its set local.
>I've updated A47 to include the address.
>
> RS>  gr> I personally host a point system on SCINET, and they are able to
send
> RS>  gr> netmails throughout when we tested it.  Netsurge confirmed all of
the
> RS>  gr> addressing in the netmails produced from Mystic match the same when
> RS>  gr> they are generated by HPT (the Husky tosser) too.  This was several
>
> RS> Echo mail works for all networks, only netmail has been affected.  Let
> RS> me know if I can provide any other information...
>
>Yes, I am speaking of Netmail here too.  I believe there are also two FTN
>networks that are hubbed entirely by Mystic on a Pi and I haven't heard
>anything from them (yet).  It could be unnoticed or that they haven't upgraded
>though.
>
>What does the output of "fidopoll route" look like on both the systems you
>have?
>
>We weren't able to find an issue with this over SciNet like I said, but we
only
>tested Windows and Linux not Linux on a Pi (although that really shouldn't
>matter).
>
>--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2020/09/27 (Windows/64)
>

-- 
yrNews Usenet Reader for iOS
http://appstore.com/yrNewsUsenetReader

--- Mystic BBS/NNTP v1.12 A47 2020/09/12 (Linux/64)