On Sat 2010-Oct-16 18:45, mark lewis (1:3634/12) wrote to Richard Webb:

 ml> the problem is that their BW has not had the y2k fix applied to it
 ml> and so the TO: field name has a leading number in it... there are
 ml> two fixes available... both are on my system...

You gonna tell them the filenames or make them search?  (-:

 ml> the first goes in the zip command to run a bat which then fixes up
 ml> the reply packet before calling zip to create the archive...

 ml> the second is a binary patch to the C routines in BW... there's a
 ml> patch for both, the reader and for the door(s)...

Hallelujah!  (-:[


Regards,

Roger 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+