Hi Rich, as you were just saying about Re: Gang Turf....
RW> CH> Excellent topic, Tom. What do you think about a "Task Force"
RW> CH> strategy whereby the task force would move into such an area before
RW> CH> the gang has a chance to take over? The task force could organize
RW> CH> and inform the citizens while taking police action to discourage the
RW> CH> gang members.
RW>
RW> RB> So, basically, the police would just be another gang,
RW> RB> starting things out with an adversarial, aggressive
RW> RB> attitude? Sounds horrible, but *very* feasible.
RW>
RW> My suggestion would be allowing every adult in the area
RW> to carry a concealed weapon. Let the gang know that
RW> they are in danger if the try to commit a crime.
The major problem that I see with that is that is that most crimes
committed those areas are property crimes which do not carry a death
penalty. This means that in order for the citizen to act with the
possibility of deadly force, he/she must feel that their life (or a
third party's) are in immediate danger of loss or serious bodily harm.
As far as I know, the only other times a citizen may shoot is to prevent
a rape or arson of an occupied building. A citizen cannot shoot someone
for resisting arrest. The bottom line is that unless it falls into a
legal shooting situation, carrying a gun is a rather empty threat.
Of course, one could attempt to stop the goblins as a normal citizen
should and then when they threatened you, it could very well be, "Katy,
bar the door...." :^)
RD
sandman@azstarnet.com
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
A well-educated Congress being necessary for the governing of a free
state, the right of the people to read and write books shall not be
infringed.
___
X KWQ/2 1.2i X Don't fight with ugly people.......they have nothing to lose.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------
* Origin: DPSystem:4285 OS2-WARPED 520-290-8418 USR V.e+ (1:300/105)
|