From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_03F3_01C561D1.D3162470
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Still unwilling to answer a yes or no question with yes or no and =
instead change the topic.  Enjoy.

Rich

  "Adam"  wrote in message =
news:4295b2b5{at}w3.nls.net...
  Rich wrote:

  >    And you still try to change the topic. Let's try again
  >

  No I'm not, you're just trying your old & failed tactic of keeping=20
  asking questions as a diversion.

  You wrote:

      "java is not a generic term.  it is a brand name sun applies to=20
  mmany different things."

  I wrote:

  "Just like MS does to .Net."


  >    On the subject of java being a generic term, you failed to answer =
the=20
  > question and instead stated that it is as generic to you as ..NET=20
  > without answering that either.  Are you unable or unwilling to give =
a=20
  > clear yes or no answer?

  I have given you multiple examples of .Net being used as a brand.

  Sometimes .Net is the antecedant e.g.

  .Net Passport

  Sometimes as the qualifier e.g.

  VB.Net
  ASP.Net

  I have stated that both MS (with .Net) & Sun (with Java) use the =
relvant=20
  terms as generic brands.

  What precisely do you find so hard to comprehend? The whole concept f=20
  branding or the conflict between the reality of MS branding .Net vs =
the=20
  marketing approved set of guff wrt .Net being all about ECMA & ISO =
which=20
  you feel the need to parrot?

  Adam
------=_NextPart_000_03F3_01C561D1.D3162470
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   Still
unwilling to answer =
a yes or no=20
question with yes or no and instead change the topic.  =
Enjoy.
 
Rich
 

  "Adam" <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moesmailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes">mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes
A>>=20
  wrote in message news:4295b2b5{at}w3.nls.net...Ri=
ch=20
  wrote:>    And you
still try to change the =
topic.=20
  Let's try again>No I'm not, you're
just trying your old =
&=20
  failed tactic of keeping asking questions as a =
diversion.You=20
  wrote:    "java is
not a generic term.  it =
is a=20
  brand name sun applies to mmany different
things."I=20
  wrote:"Just like MS does to =
.Net.">   =20
  On the subject of java being a generic term, you failed to answer the =
>=20
  question and instead stated that it is as generic to you as ..NET =
>=20
  without answering that either.  Are you unable or unwilling to =
give a=20
  > clear yes or no answer?I have
given you multiple =
examples of=20
  .Net being used as a brand.Sometimes .Net is the antecedant=20
  e.g..Net PassportSometimes as the
qualifier=20
  e.g.VB.NetASP.NetI have
stated that both MS (with =
.Net)=20
  & Sun (with Java) use the relvant terms as generic =
brands.What=20
  precisely do you find so hard to comprehend? The whole concept f =
branding=20
  or the conflict between the reality of MS branding .Net vs the =
marketing=20
  approved set of guff wrt .Net being all about ECMA & ISO which =
you=20
  feel the need to
parrot?Adam

------=_NextPart_000_03F3_01C561D1.D3162470--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5