HI there,

On Sat 2038-Oct-16 18:45, mark lewis (1:3634/12) wrote to Richard Webb:

ml> the problem is that their BW has not had the y2k fix applied to it
ml> and so the TO: field name has a leading number in it... there are
ml> two fixes available... both are on my system...

ml> the first goes in the zip command to run a bat which then fixes
upml> the reply packet before calling zip to create the archive...

ml> the second is a binary patch to the C routines in BW... there's a
ml> patch for both, the reader and for the door(s)...

O.k.  DIdn't know DOc was using the bw door as well, but
should have figured that.  HOpe he sees this.

Regards,
           Richard
... I stand corrected.  May I sit down now?
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+