From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_021F_01C5604D.09F6E190
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Still trying to change the topic.

   They are not all called java as sun has done.  It's not that java is =
a sun brand.  It's that it is used in a way that blurs the meaning.  For =
an example of this look no further than this thread where it was claimed =
that java is a generic term.  It was that claim I disputed.  Since you =
are arguing with me should we all believe that you believe java is a =
generic term?=20

Rich

  "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message =
news:4292ef1e{at}w3.nls.net...
  Rich wrote:
  >    Nope.  Everything has its own name.  Even so there has been =
confusion=20
  > so .NET was removed from some names.
  > =20

  Chuckle. My my my my what lovely revisionism. It's like airbrushing=20
  trotsky out of the photos.

  So is VB.Net a web URL?

  How about ASP.Net?

  & what about .Net Passport? & Then there is the .Net Framework.

  If "everything has it's own name" in the above style then gosh it must =

  just be a coincidence that so many MS things have .Net in their name & =

  not that .Net is a brandname which MS applies to many things.

  & then there is the "look for the .Net connected" logo  campaign =
etc.etc.

  No sign of branding there.....except possibly across your butt.

  Or did you opt for the .Net Connected logo tatoo instead?


  Adam






  > Rich
  > =20
  >=20
  >     "Adam"      > wrote in message
  >     news:4291a4ac$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  >     Rich wrote:
  >=20
  >      >    java is not a generic term.  it is a brand name sun =
applies to
  >     mmany
  >      > different things.
  >      >=20
  >     Just like MS does to .Net.
  >=20
  >     Adam
------=_NextPart_000_021F_01C5604D.09F6E190
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   Still
trying to change the =

topic.
 
   They are
not all called =
java as sun=20
has done.  It's not that java is a sun brand.  It's that it is =

used in a way that blurs the meaning.  For an
example of = this=20
look no further than this thread where it was claimed that java is a = generic=20
term.  It was that claim I disputed.  Since you
are = arguing with=20
me should we all believe that you believe java is a generic=20
term? 
 
Rich
 

  "Adam Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAM_softfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAM_softfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAM_softfab.com>
= wrote in=20
  message news:4292ef1e{at}w3.nls.net...Ri=
ch=20
  wrote:>    Nope. 
Everything has its own=20
  name.  Even so there has been confusion > so .NET was =
removed from=20
  some names.>  Chuckle. My
my my my what lovely=20
  revisionism. It's like airbrushing trotsky out of the =
photos.So is=20
  VB.Net a web URL?How about
ASP.Net?& what about =
.Net=20
  Passport? & Then there is the .Net Framework.If =
"everything has=20
  it's own name" in the above style then gosh it must just be a =
coincidence=20
  that so many MS things have .Net in their name & not that .Net =
is a=20
  brandname which MS applies to many things.&
then there is =
the=20
  "look for the .Net connected" logo  campaign
etc.etc.No =
sign of=20
  branding there.....except possibly across your
butt.Or did you =
opt for=20
  the .Net Connected logo tatoo=20
 
instead?Adam>
=
Rich> =20
  >
>     "Adam"
<mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moesmailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes">mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes
A>>    =20
  <mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts=">mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes">mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts=
{at}moes>>=20
  wrote in message>     news:4291a4ac$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>    =20
  Rich wrote:>
>     =20
  >    java is not a generic
term.  it is a brand =
name=20
  sun applies to>    =20
  mmany>     
> different=20
 
things.>     
>=20
  >     Just like MS
does to .Net.>=20
  >    
Adam

------=_NextPart_000_021F_01C5604D.09F6E190--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5