| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: jvm language limitations |
From: Adam Flinton Rich wrote: > Still trying to change the topic. > No not at all .Net is a brand which is applied to many things. > They are not all called java as sun has done. Blimey neither is java. No your have "Java Enerprise Edition & "Java Desktop System" etc. Are you saying that .Net does not feature in their names? > It's not that java is > a sun brand. It's that it is used in a way that blurs the meaning. ROFLMAO Hello Mr Coalmine kettle. Gee what does ".Net Connected" mean? Does it mean that it must use ASP.Net? VB.Net? That in order to connect to it you must be running ".Net"? > For > an example of this look no further than this thread where it was claimed > that java is a generic term. It was that claim I disputed. Since you > are arguing with me should we all believe that you believe java is a > generic term? > It's as generic as .Net. It is a branded language/runtime/set of specs etc. exactly like .Net is trying to be. Personally I don't like things like using java in a linux distro name. Adam > Rich > > > "Adam Flinton"* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.