TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nthelp
to: Robert Comer
from: Ellen K.
date: 2005-06-16 22:14:34
subject: Re: clustering

From: Ellen K. 

Well, Standard is very cost-effective.   :)

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:23:22 -0400, "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
:

>> The other thing to bear in mind is that you may not need Enterprise.
>> Enterprise is currently needed if you want to use the prebuilt log
>> shipping or clustering, or more than 2 CPUs or more than 4 GB RAM. I
>> think you also need Enterprise for indexed views (what Oracle calls
>> materialized views).  If you want log shipping on Standard you can RYO.
>> I'm using Standard on all my current databases, and it's about 1/4 the
>> cost.
>
>We wouldn't need any of those, so no need for enterprise.
>
>- Bob Comer
>
>
>
>"Ellen K."  wrote in message
>news:cm73b1loqb99g2ngkpn4bk8pdv0j6h9opl{at}4ax.com...
>> The other thing to bear in mind is that you may not need Enterprise.
>> Enterprise is currently needed if you want to use the prebuilt log
>> shipping or clustering, or more than 2 CPUs or more than 4 GB RAM.  I
>> think you also need Enterprise for indexed views (what Oracle calls
>> materialized views).  If you want log shipping on Standard you can RYO.
>> I'm using Standard on all my current databases, and it's about 1/4 the
>> cost.
>>
>> For 2005 they are coming out with another level I forget the name of
>> that's between Standard and Enterprise but is only slightly more
>> expensive than the current Standard (I think list is $6K vs $5K for the
>> current Standard), it has failover clustering, up to I think 4 CPUs, and
>> as much RAM as your O/S allows.
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:36:42 -0400, "Robert Comer"
>>  wrote in message
>> :
>>
>>>So it wouldn't make sense here...
>>>
>>>- Bob Comer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
>>>news:nr23b1l8rm1mrth1jm9tvj5mc6tvu34tpv{at}4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:22:38 -0400, "Robert Comer"
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> As for per-user, I can't imagine going per-user on
a production
>>>>>> database, per-CPU gets cheaper at a pretty low
number of users.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just what is that pretty low number of users?
>>>>
>>>> Looks like just under 100, based on this:
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/default.asp
>>>>
>>>> Enterprise is $19128 per processor.
>>>>
>>>> Per server + user CAL price is $6382 + $146/user, so
>>>>
>>>> (19128 - 6382)/146 = 87
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.