Received: from  ([206.46.170.103])
 by fonix.org (wcSMTP v5.5.450.2)
 with SMTP id 29310687; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 16:41:37 +0000
Received: from BobDial ([67.248.207.48]) by out003.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.20 201-253-122-126-120-20021101) with ESMTP
          id 
          for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:41:31 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Bob Dial" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: Mirror Anti-Shock Helps!!!!
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:40:56 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
out003.verizon.net from [67.248.207.48] at Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:41:21 -0600


----- Original Message -----
From: 
To: 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: Mirror Anti-Shock Helps!!!!


> [fonix.photo]

Hello, Terrence!

>
> Bob: That's an interesting idea. Sometimes tricks like that work. The good
> news for me is that the Nikon D100 "anti-shock" setting
(delayed shutter
> firing after the mirror flops up) has greatly aided my efforts to get
sharp
> photos with my long lens and tele-converter combination.

That's good news.  Glad you've found a practical solution!  

> My last bird
> shooting efforts have produced some sharp shots. -- Terrence

Good luck and great shooting!

BobD



>
>
> -> Hi, Bob!
> ->
> -> >From: "Bob Dial" 
> -> >Reply-To: 
> -> >To: photo{at}fanciful.org
> -> >Subject: Re: Mirror Anti-Shock Helps!!!!
> -> >Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:48:29 -0600
> -> >
> -> >
> -> >----- Original Message -----
> -> >From: 
> -> >To: 
> -> >Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 5:48 PM
> -> >Subject: Mirror Anti-Shock Helps!!!!
> -> >
> -> >Hi, Terrence
> -> >
> -> >Have been following your effort to get the most out of that long lens
with
> -> >the birds, etc.  Know some of the problems involved so, while you are
doing
> -> >the experiments you might want to try something rather unconventional.
> -> >
> -> >With full knowledge of a bird's aptitude to make sudden and often
frequent
> -> >movements, sometimes they are still for a few seconds.  It may go
against
> -> >the grain at first blush but might prove to be useful.
> -> >
> -> >Doing interiors of some commercial and manufacturing plants, even with
a
> -> >view camera there was difficulty in really getting ultra sharp images
due
> -> >to
> -> >equipment running which created a slight vibration.  Faster film and
raised
> -> >shutter speeds didn't help much.  The best shots eventually came from
> -> >slower
> -> >speeds.  The theory is that the lens will record movement through a
rather
> -> >fixed side to side and/or up and down path, and repeat it.  With the
image
> -> >recording all of that the result is a rather stabile looking shot that
does
> -> >not show blurs of slight movement.
> ->
> -> It make sense, Bob...
> -> The relatively more steady part of the bird gets more/longer expossure
and
> -> therefor gets registered more on the film, so the bird appear
sharper...
> ->
> -> The law of relativity, eh?   :)
> ->
> -> Regrds,
> -> -Wayne
> ->
> ->
> ->
> -> _________________________________________________________________
> -> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> -> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> ->
> -> --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5