From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01EE_01C572BE.2C339D60
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   The underlying mechanics of Windows Update have changed over time.  I =
believe there is a per-user vs. per-machine sensitivity in the current =
versions (v5, v6) of Windows Update.

Rich

  "John Beckett" 
wrote in message =
news:42b23aa8.1995779{at}216.144.1.254...
  "Geo"  wrote in message
news::
  > Rich's idea sounds promising. Did it work with windows update in the =
past?

  I'm a bit vague because it is a fairly new install from an XP/SP2
  integrated CD ... I haven't settled into a routine yet. However, yes, =
I
  must have run Windows Update because I haven't hooked it up to SUS, =
and I
  wouldn't connect it to our network (which is pretty rough) without a =
full
  WU - but was I using the proxy then?

  John

------=_NextPart_000_01EE_01C572BE.2C339D60
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   The
underlying mechanics =
of Windows=20
Update have changed over time.  I believe there is a per-user
vs.=20 per-machine sensitivity in the current versions (v5, v6) of
Windows =

Update.
 
Rich
 

  "John Beckett" <FirstnameSurname{at}com=">mailto:FirstnameSurname{at}compuserve.com.omit">FirstnameSurname{at}com=
puserve.com.omit>=20
  wrote in message news:42b23aa8.1995779{at}216.14=
4.1.254..."Geo"=20
  <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote =
in message=20
   * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)

SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786

@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267