From: Mike '/m' 

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:41:02 -0400, "Geo"  wrote:

>"Robert Comer"  wrote
in message
>news:42e63723$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Maybe they don't like the bovine reference.
>>
>> I gave up worrying about names, as long as what they come up with isn't
>> objectionable.
>
>Do you consider "Windows for Idiots" to be objectionable?
(compared to narco
>I mean)

Windows for Idiots is OK.  The recipient of the designation is accepting
the designation by buying the book.

On the other hand, Microsoft employees' continual "Windows users are
idiots" mantra is not OK, because it is a vendor calling its customers
"idiots".

A subtle, yet significant, difference.

 /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5