From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_044D_01C59C2D.E7446DD0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   All this crap that the bozos claiming to have proved something is =
nothing but PR.  No one made an argument that writing programs with a =
programming language is not possible, quite the opposite in fact.  Why =
you are an idiot unable to see that is what should concern you.  It = seems
that you latch on to such bozos often.

Rich

  "Geo"  wrote in message
news:42f7d73a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Signing is a security mechanism, it's got nothing to do with public =
relations. Same for the rest of this discussion, POC code is not about =
public relations, it's about proving that something is possible so that =
they can get past the argument that it is/is not possible and deal with =
realities.

  Geo.
    "Rich"  wrote in message news:42f7cbbb{at}w3.nls.net...
       Why the topic change?  Are you interesting in public relations =
proofs of concept?

       Signing exists for the same reason there is signing of anything =
else, to allow those that want to to verify the signature and act on = that.

    Rich

      "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:42f7bb99$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      Oh come on rich, why do they have signing for scripts?

      Geo.
        "Rich"  wrote in message news:42f79421$1{at}w3.nls.net...
           What does any of this have to do with programming?  All this =
noise is public relations.  What did they say in your public relations =
classes on how to get attention when you have nothing?

        Rich

          "Geo"  wrote in message =
news:42f6d797$1{at}w3.nls.net...
          =20

          In my programming classes they didn't call any of the programs =
"proof of concept code" so either someone was saying that or some
new = "proof of concept" teaching phenomenon has taken place in
the past 6 = months.

          Geo.
            "Rich"  wrote in message news:42f678ca$1{at}w3.nls.net...
               Your key fragment below is "whoever was saying it wasn't =
possible".  No body was saying this.  It's a programming language.  By
= design you can write programs.  You don't gain credibility by making =
bogus claims then arguing against them.


------=_NextPart_000_044D_01C59C2D.E7446DD0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   All this
crap that the =
bozos claiming=20
to have proved something is nothing but PR.  No one made an =
argument that=20
writing programs with a programming language is not possible, quite the = opposite=20
in fact.  Why you are an idiot unable to see that is what should =
concern=20
you.  It seems that you latch on to such bozos
often.
 
Rich
 

  "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote=20
  in message news:42f7d73a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Signing is a security
mechanism, it's =
got nothing=20
  to do with public relations. Same for the rest of this discussion, POC =
code is=20
  not about public relations, it's about proving that something is =
possible so=20
  that they can get past the argument that it is/is not possible and =
deal with=20
  realities.
   
  Geo.
  

    "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f7cbbb{at}w3.nls.net...
       Why the topic =
change?  Are=20
    you interesting in public relations proofs of concept?
     
      
Signing exists for the =
same reason=20
    there is signing of anything else, to allow those that want to to =
verify the=20
    signature and act on that.
     
    Rich
     
    

      "Geo." <fake{at}barkdom.com>=20">mailto:fake{at}barkdom.com">fake{at}barkdom.com>=20
      wrote in message news:42f7bb99$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      Oh come on rich, why do
they have =
signing for=20
      scripts?
       
      Geo.
      

        "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f79421$1{at}w3.nls.net...
          
What does any of =
this have to=20
        do with programming?  All this noise is public =
relations. =20
        What did they say in your public relations classes on how to get =

        attention when you have nothing?
         
        Rich
         
        

          "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote =
in message=20
          news:42f6d797$1{at}w3.nls.net...
          <chuckle> 
           
          In my programming classes =
they didn't=20
          call any of the programs "proof of concept code" so either =
someone was=20
          saying that or some new "proof of concept" teaching phenomenon =
has=20
          taken place in the past 6 months.
           
          Geo.
          

            "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f678ca$1{at}w3.nls.net...
               Your key =
fragment below is=20
            "whoever was saying it wasn't possible".  No
body was =
saying=20
            this.  It's a programming language.  By design you =
can=20
            write programs.  You don't gain credibility by making =
bogus=20
            claims then arguing against them.
             
             

------=_NextPart_000_044D_01C59C2D.E7446DD0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5