Hi Mike,  


 JD>> Has anyone ever successfully used Squish's documented file forwarding
 JD>> of routed netmails with file attaches, with a Bink style system?   If
 JD>> so, I'd really like to see the pertinent parts of your Squish.cfg and
 JD>> Route.cfg.

 MT> It's been forever since I used it for anything, but I had to use this 
 MT> to forward file-attaches from my point system (at the office - No LD 
 MT> dialing privs) to the rest of the world via my node (at home - local 
 MT> call).  However, my node delivered the attach directly to the 
 MT> destination rather than via yet another intermediate system.  So 
 MT> "ForwardFrom File " was the only
statement required to 
 MT> support my scenario.


 MT> It might be worthwhile to test again without the "ROUTE
File" in the 
 MT> mix and see if your ?LO entry looks straight in the original ?LO 
 MT> before being shuffled over to another by a routing command. 

ok.   


 MT>  And, of 
 MT> course, verify that the file is actually still in your inbound and 
 MT> not shuffled off elsewhere or deleted by other processing logic.

Yep.  It is when testing, and was back then, when he sent it. 


Already replied to your netmails.  My replies went back routed though. To
140/1, and I see you connect there, so you might already have them.

Thank you for testing, especially on your dime, long distance.  
Sorry to have to report back that it didn't work.  :(    

I mentioned the 'newer' Y2K ver of Squish in one of those netmails, versus
the pre-Y2K version.   What do you think of that as a possibility? ... I
see you mention above that it was quite a while ago when it used to work
for you.



Thanks

                                    .....Joe

--- Msged/2 TE 05