From: "Geo" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C59C65.E73B99C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

virus are programs.

As for latching onto things, so those default install settings never = came
back to bite MS in the ass, why did they change so many of them in = xpsp2?

Geo.
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:42f7db72{at}w3.nls.net...
     All this crap that the bozos claiming to have proved something is =
nothing but PR.  No one made an argument that writing programs with a =
programming language is not possible, quite the opposite in fact.  Why =
you are an idiot unable to see that is what should concern you.  It = seems
that you latch on to such bozos often.

  Rich

    "Geo"  wrote in message =
news:42f7d73a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    Signing is a security mechanism, it's got nothing to do with public =
relations. Same for the rest of this discussion, POC code is not about =
public relations, it's about proving that something is possible so that =
they can get past the argument that it is/is not possible and deal with =
realities.

    Geo.
      "Rich"  wrote in message news:42f7cbbb{at}w3.nls.net...
         Why the topic change?  Are you interesting in public relations =
proofs of concept?

         Signing exists for the same reason there is signing of anything =
else, to allow those that want to to verify the signature and act on = that.

      Rich

        "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:42f7bb99$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        Oh come on rich, why do they have signing for scripts?

        Geo.
          "Rich"  wrote in message news:42f79421$1{at}w3.nls.net...
             What does any of this have to do with programming?  All =
this noise is public relations.  What did they say in your public =
relations classes on how to get attention when you have nothing?

          Rich

            "Geo"  wrote in message =
news:42f6d797$1{at}w3.nls.net...
            =20

            In my programming classes they didn't call any of the =
programs "proof of concept code" so either someone was saying
that or = some new "proof of concept" teaching phenomenon has
taken place in the = past 6 months.

            Geo.
              "Rich"  wrote in message
news:42f678ca$1{at}w3.nls.net...
                 Your key fragment below is "whoever was saying it =
wasn't possible".  No body was saying this.  It's a programming =
language.  By design you can write programs.  You don't gain credibility =
by making bogus claims then arguing against them.


------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C59C65.E73B99C0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








virus are
programs.
 
As for latching onto things, so those =
default=20
install settings never came back to bite MS in the ass, why did they = change so=20
many of them in xpsp2?
 
Geo.

  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f7db72{at}w3.nls.net...
     All
this crap that the =
bozos=20
  claiming to have proved something is nothing but PR.  No one made =
an=20
  argument that writing programs with a programming language is not =
possible,=20
  quite the opposite in fact.  Why you are an idiot unable to see =
that is=20
  what should concern you.  It seems that you latch on to such =
bozos=20
  often.
   
  Rich
   
  

    "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>=20">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>=20
    wrote in message news:42f7d73a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    Signing is a security mechanism, =
it's got=20
    nothing to do with public relations. Same for the rest of this =
discussion,=20
    POC code is not about public relations, it's about proving that =
something is=20
    possible so that they can get past the argument that it is/is not =
possible=20
    and deal with realities.
     
    Geo.
    

      "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f7cbbb{at}w3.nls.net...
         Why
the topic =
change?  Are=20
      you interesting in public relations proofs of =
concept?
       
        
Signing exists for =
the same=20
      reason there is signing of anything else, to allow those that want =
to to=20
      verify the signature and act on that.
       
      Rich
       
      

        "Geo." <fake{at}barkdom.com>">mailto:fake{at}barkdom.com">fake{at}barkdom.com>
wrote =
in message=20
        news:42f7bb99$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        Oh come on rich, why do they =
have signing=20
        for scripts?
         
        Geo.
        

          "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f79421$1{at}w3.nls.net...
            
What does any of =
this have=20
          to do with programming?  All this noise is public=20
          relations.  What did they say in your public relations =
classes on=20
          how to get attention when you have nothing?
           
          Rich
           
          

            "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
=
wrote in=20
            message news:42f6d797$1{at}w3.nls.net...
            <chuckle> =

             
            In my programming classes =
they didn't=20
            call any of the programs "proof of concept code" so either =
someone=20
            was saying that or some new "proof of concept" teaching =
phenomenon=20
            has taken place in the past 6 months.
             
            Geo.
            

              "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:42f678ca$1{at}w3.nls.net...
                 Your key =
fragment below=20
              is "whoever was saying it wasn't
possible".  No body =
was=20
              saying this.  It's a programming language.  By =
design=20
              you can write programs.  You don't gain credibility =
by making=20
              bogus claims then arguing against them.
               
               

------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C59C65.E73B99C0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5