-> Viktor Schauberger constructed a levitating machine 1943. A round disk with  
-> 60 cm diameter and weight  of 40kg. It broke the six 6 1/4"
steel bolts and 
-> flew straight up through the roof. It was driven with some sort of silicon 
-> gel that seems to have produced some type of high voltage electricity. The 
-> machine generated a fluroscent light when it flew. 
  
Was a movie made of this? Or even some still photographs? If not, what 
evidence exists *now* that what you describe really happened? 
  
Forget the testimony of eye-witnesses. Every experiment that is done 
with them shows that their accounts are highly unreliable. They see 
what they want to see, or are told to see. Back in about 1960, there 
was a big fuss over a device called the "Dean Drive", which could 
allegedly levitate. Many eye-witnesses swore that they had seen it do 
so. Most of them did not mention that there was a rope attached between 
the ceiling and the floor of the room in which the demonstration was 
held, and that this rope passed through a tube in the device. 
Supposedly, it was to tether the device so it would not fly away and 
hurt anyone. But inside the tube was an unseen mechanism that allowed 
the Dean Drive simply to climb the rope. If that's levitation, then 
it's no big trick. 
  
-> Another book describes how the priests i tibet get up the building stones 
-> on top of the mountains. They shold have used very big horns and drums place 
-> in a semi circle arond the stone in the center. After a while of horning and 
-> trumming, suddenly the stone flew up on the moutain says the eye witness. Ca 
-> this be true? 
  
Nope. 
  
-> Someone repeated Galleis experiment but also with magnetic material. The 
-> objects fell with different speeds... Some years ago the BBC science radio 
-> reported of some odd Russian levitating experiment. But suddenly the Russian 
-> got very silent and refused to say no more. 
  
Who was this "someone"? You are repeating (and probably embellishing) 
vague rumours and pretending that they are important facts. Yes, it is 
true that, in the Earth's magnetic field, the speeds at which magnets 
fall are likely to be slightly different from the speeds at which 
non-metallic objects fall. So what? Air-resistance, of course, has far 
larger effects on falling speeds. So what, again. 
  
-> When an object get caught in a gravity field the time slows down. The object 
-> loses energy and that energy must go somewhere. It is converted to movement. 
-> Reverse this process and, voila, you have a levitating machine. Flying 
-> planes with some odd millions parts that (falls apart) must co-work seems 
-> somewhat obsolete and out of date. 
->   
-> Excuse my rotten english it's not what it have been and never has anyway! 
  
Your problem isn't with your slightly imperfect English. It is with 
your total lack of understanding of the things you write about. 
  
                           dow 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5