From: Mike '/m' 


Sygate is nice, somewhat inflexible, but nonetheless, nice.

 /m

On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 20:55:51 -0500, "Glenn Meadows"
 wrote:

>I typically find ZA to be far to visually intrusive.  When using a firewall,
>I've grown far more accustomed to Sygate.
>
>I've becoming even more familiar with the InJoy firewall though, nice piece
>of software (no free version though).  We've moving to the 100 user Pro
>version as our corporate firewall product.  Lots of nice user system
>feedback.
>
>We've used a Qwest managed firewall for the past 3 years, but they charge a
>huge sum of money for the "privilege".  On top of their data
service, we've
>been paying way too much.  The cost to purchase the 100 user InJoy, will be
>amortized over 2.5 months when you figure in the price of the host computer
>that it runs on.  Plus the drop in the price of the T-1, and PRI (phones)
>moving all to XO, will save close to $4,000/month.
>
>The InJoy has it's own VPN client, so running the 2 user on the laptops,
>gets the VPN tunnel into the corporate network.
>
>From talking with Bjarne at FX, it turns out that the core firewall engine
>has been licensed to many of the major firewall appliance companies to be
>used as the internal engine on the hardware boxes.  He chose to make it a
>full software version.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5