From: "Paul Ranson" 

That's an interesting idea. Do an encrypted transaction with MS to enable a
firewall configuration change. That would be more secure...

Paul


"Geo."  wrote in message
news:432858e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Gee you make it sound so easy, if the admin owns the machine then
> activation
> is doomed to failure. Or is there some point to this "more tedious"?
>
> I guess the users' firewall doesn't need to be as secure as the copy
> protection, huh?
>
> Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5