On 10 May 96  08:31:56 Bob Lawrence typed to Keith Richardson about The Day
We saw the truth

 >   I wrote some hard stuff to see if I could flush any out. I was
 > amazed the find that Niels Petersen (I wish he's settle one name for a
 > while) jumped up using that very logic: "If I'd been there with my
 > trust 303 I could have killed Bryant and saved the world." It's really
 > sad.

Yes it is really sad that Bob lawrence, a person who I thought could read
and comprehend to some extent, could manage to garble my words  (or his
interpretation of them) to such an extent that they  bore absolutely  no
resemblence to what I actually typed.

What I actually wrote was......

START QUOTE
=====-----------
One person, with a .22 from 100 yards could have dropped him, and saved the
lives of all those who were outside the cafe.  Then the police could have
booked that person for the murder of the looney.
What would have been the public reaction to that scenario?
=======----------
END QUOTE

Lets take your statement in pieces.

You claimed that I said..       "If I had been there"

Read the quoted text above and find the where I used the word "I"

and followed up with....
             "with my trust 303"

Please find the word "my" and "303" in the quote.

"I could have killed Bryant and saved the world"...
appears only in your statement. NOT in my  quoted text

How the hell can you place words in my mouth that I DID NOT write.

Either...  you didn't read it ? you failed to understand it?, your paranoia
re firearms of _any_sort_ had taken hold of your brain?, malice ??.....

I even asked a question at the end of the paragraph, which you not only failed
to answer, but  removed completely from your rabid reply.

I don't know the answer to what was in your head when you misrepresent my
words in such a distorted form in a a public echo, but until a I receive a
reply concerning your blatant lie, your credibilty as a person to discuss a
subject with, has been reduced to zero.

Some time ago Christian posted a message to you, and you replied to him

=================
(25)    Sun 1 Oct 95  9:04a     Rcvd: Sun 1 Oct  1:29p
By: Bob Lawrence
To: Christian Paulings
Re: Bloody Windows!
St: Rcvd                                                             26>
=====-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AREA:AUST_AVTECH

  The point I made is that naming a PIF the same as the DOS app means
that Windows uses that PIF, even in the path and information inside
that PIF is fake... under VB. It seems that VB does something strange
callings its SHELL() which does not happen in the WinExec() API call.

 The rest of your message is just meaningless shit.

There is a fine line between being funny and being offensive. You crossed it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bob
    Blue Wave/QWK v2.12

{at}PID: PQWK 2.35
==============================


I can only say that there is a line (and it is NOT a fine one) between truth and lies

AND YOU CROSSED IT !!!

Obviously your origin line needs the "precision" removed.
"Blatant Lies" appears to be a more accurate description.

--- FMail/386 0.98