I know sod all about American law and whether this woman broke any. But she
did demonstrate a perfect example of a hypocritical bitch.
"RedFish"  wrote in message
news:qbsr8.9356$nK3.2651192559@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> to reiterate.......
>
> --
> "RedFish"  wrote in message
> news:FXvn8.71039$2u5.98629796@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> > Sarah Brady took her grief for her husband and translated that into
> > something evil.  Something *SHE believed should be pressed onto every
> other
> > American citizen simply because *She thought it should be.  She
determined
> > that SHE was right and everyone else was wrong.
> > And from that initiated steps to take away the Constitutional rights of
> > everyone.
> >
> > Break a *gun* law?  Perhaps not.....but she did break a multitude of
other
> > *laws.
> > Just as Hitler and Hussein structured societies to suit *their beliefs
and
> > ideas.....Brady is no less guilty.
> > Just as a thief will steal money in cases where they *believe it is owed
> > them because of what society has "done to them"; Sarah Brady has stolen
> > ethics, morals, safety and lives from millions and millions of innocent
> > citizens because she felt she was "owed" something as well.
> >
> > She should be imprisoned no more or less than the man who shot her
> > husband....because in effect, she took the very *same weapon that the
> > shooter had and attempted to kill everyone else with it.
> >
> > Thank God common sense prevailed in the end....but that makes her no
less
> > the guilty.
> >
> > --
> > Randy RedFish
> > .
> >
> > .
> > "Joan Hampton"  wrote in message
> > news:778fa5cb.0203241751.52956de3@posting.google.com...
> > > Sarah Brady did NOT break any gun laws - she didn't even come close.
> > > The New York Daily News published a retraction on Saturday totally
> > > taking the blame for their mistake.  Here's what they said:
> > >
> > > CORRECTION
> > >
> > > A story in some early editions of yesterday's Daily News incorrectly
> > > reported that gun-control advocate Sarah Brady may have skirted
> > > Delaware's gun laws when she bought a rifle for her adult son but did
> > > not declare who was going to own the weapon.
> > >
> > > The Delaware Department of Justice initially insisted to The News that
> > > gun purchasers must declare who the weapon was intended for so that
> > > person's background could be checked. Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the
> > > Delaware Department of Justice said it misinterpreted the law and that
> > > Brady was not obligated to state that the gun was for her son as long
> > > as he was legally qualified to own a firearm. In addition, a spokesman
> > > for Brady said, "Sarah Brady told the gun store that the gun was for
> > > her son and filled out the forms that they asked her to fill out."
> > >
> > > The News regrets the error.
> >
> >
>
>