From: "Robert Comer" 

Then you trust MS not to be compromised -- not a good option....

- Bob Comer


"Paul Ranson"  wrote in message
news:4328b6fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> That's an interesting idea. Do an encrypted transaction with MS to enable
> a
> firewall configuration change. That would be more secure...
>
> Paul
>
>
> "Geo."  wrote in message
news:432858e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Gee you make it sound so easy, if the admin owns the machine then
>> activation
>> is doomed to failure. Or is there some point to this "more
tedious"?
>>
>> I guess the users' firewall doesn't need to be as secure as the copy
>> protection, huh?
>>
>> Geo.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5