(clip)
GG>TE>It means exactly what it says.  The problem is
GG>TE>getting the socialist nanny-state types to admit it.
GG>Ah, so it's a state vs. national law that is the problem? The individual
GG>states have the ability to overrule the Constitution? Or re-interpret it?
GG>- GWG
        That's not what he meant by "the nanny-state"; that's a term for
        a socialist, total control kind of givernment. The basic problem
        is that politicians and "feel good" types simply ignore the
        Constitution whenever it's convenient for them to do so. And
        since our Supreme Court became politicized back in the '30's, we
        can't rely on an just interpretation of the meaning of the
        Constitution. Ernie P.
---
 X SLMR 2.1a X I was born free; I WILL die free.
--- Maximus/2 2.02
---------------