0n (19 Apr 06) George Pope wrote to Cindy Haglund...

 GP> On (19 Apr 06) Cindy Haglund wrote to George Pope...
 CH>  GP> That's a simplistic cynical answer, not considering any of the
 CH> actual
 CH>  GP> facts!
 GP>  CH>
 CH> What do you expect? We're suppsed to be kept in the dark and accept
 CH> 'because I said so" answers. This sort of answer has been drilled into
 CH> us since birth. Asking why is ... is....  uh.. Dangerous!

 GP> Then I presented you further facts to show that "Because we can"
 GP> wasn't the answer. . .

 I knew that wasn't the answer. Not the one I wanted.
 It never is! It's just an evasion.. a 'because I said so' response....


 CH> It's how those in power stay in power... they 'explain' what they do
 CH> by patting you on the head saying, "for your own good'... we know
 CH> best."

 GP> And if you accept that answer, you DESERVE that answer; me, however, I
 GP> ask for further details and I tenaciously stick to it til I get 'em!'

 WHo the hell said I accepted it? I have never accepted that sort of
answer. If I had I'd still be xtian.

Anyway I like the closer answer I posted here from elsewhere, let me
know what you disagree with.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

--- PPoint 3.01