Who Knows Father Best?

Independent Women's Forum, by Rieva Holycross, July 15, 2004

IWF believes that women must accept responsibility for their own actions and
that includes getting pregnant and knowing who the father is (pretty onerous
responsibility, don't you think?). California and plenty of other states
allow a woman to pretty much name whomever she pleases as the father of her
child and sic the state on said dad to collect child support.

Feminist organizations including the National Organization of Women (NOW)
has objected to legislation that requires the courts to vacate paternity
judgments against men who aren't, in fact, the father. Think about that.
(Did you get that, troops? -tc)

NOW wants some man, any man, to make child support payments. The woman who
doesn't even know who the father is, should not be held responsible for her
actions, is a sweet, loving, blameless mother who seeks only to care for her
child and if naming some schmuck as father who never saw her before in his
life helps her provide for the innocent babe, well then, that's fine.

Innocence is no excuse. Pay up.

In arguing against California's Paternity Justice Act, NOW claims that its
passage would harm children. Harm children? This from the
every-baby-deserves-federal-day-care, there's-no-school-too-bad-for-our-kids
crowd?

This is one more item in NOW's misguided and misbegotten agenda that seeks
to exempt women from taking responsibility for their actions and their
lives. Their mantra that it's not your fault; find somebody to blame; find
somebody to pay is a horrible model for today's woman. And, further, in the
case of nailing innocent men for child support, it is legalized theft, pure,
unalloyed misandry. No wonder the NOW gals liked it so much.


Because I care,
<+]::-{)}  (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))


... nfx v3.1                                                                 

--- EzyQwk V2.01b005 00F90260