ND> How can you say that Qb4.5 is horrible and you dispise it its a good
ND> langauge and i could even make super nintendo sysle games and such it 
ND>  its dam goog.
 
ND> its more like you dont understand it
 
its obvious you didn't read a thing i wrote.  him and some other guy
were whining about how rotten the PB IDE is and that the QB ide was
vastly superior.  i disagree strongly.  i think the qb ide massively
stinks, and that the pb ide is vastly superior.  as for your inane
arguement, the pb compiler is vastly superior to qb 4.5.  who cares if
you could write super nintendo games using qb 4.5?  don't you think
practically *any* decent compiler could pull off such a stunt?  i
believe its more of a lack of understanding on your part.
--- QM v1.00
---------------