| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: kill |
From: "Paul Ranson"
I suppose they'd be definitively antique now.... But I suspect that much of
that part of the relationship between user/kernel on the various
derivatives of Unix still running remains.
Paul
"Thees Peereboom" wrote in message
news:op.sxnp89j92hvhrx{at}news.barkto.com...
> Paul,
>
> Ultrix, haven't heard that for a long time - wasn't that running on the
> old VAX'es?
>
> - Thees Peereboom
>
>
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:14:42 +0200, Paul Ranson wrote:
>
>> It can help to have an understanding of what is happening, what 'kill'
>> does
>> etc. Although we're in the wrong room for that discussion.
>>
>> Some time ago when I worked on BSD based Ultrix systems we used to slowly
>> accumulate processes that were killed yet refused to actually depart. The
>> only way out was a reboot.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> "Frank Haber" wrote in message
>> news:43342972$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> >The process is killed and will terminate when it is unblocked.
>>>
>>> What is this, some sort of Zen Kill, then? Do I have to
redefine "kill"
>>> as a concept? It's not dead, Jim?
>>>
>>>
>>> -zombie
>>
>>
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.