Hi Bo,  

[...]


 JD> I have a couple links that do it now.
 JD> I'd have to go review and re-read old mail to get it down pat again, 
 JD> but basically there is a way to cause the missing {at}Via line by doing 
 JD> some of the routing with Irex, instead of doing the routing with the 
 JD> tosser/scanner software. 

 BS> Oh ok, i didn't knew that irex could do netmail routing.

I didn't think it could it either.  Matter of fact, I still don't.  :)
... well... sort of....  


There was some certain sequence or arrangement of the order that things
happened on his system....  something like that...  its fuzzy now, so don't
take this as meaning to be 100% correct:

If his software picked up inbound netmail and tossed it to a *.msg msgarea,
then if instead of running his scanner/packer software to pack and route it
out, if he ran  rex -send ,  perhaps that was when Irex picked up the
waiting *.msg and sent it on out.

That might be the way it happens.


 JD> I think most tosser/scanner software would 
 JD> most likely place an {at}Via stamp on the mail.  

 BS> I don't know any witch doesn't.

Long ago, I asked somebody this same question, and I believe they knew of one or two.
But I agree with you in that it is almost a standard practice, and seems to
be included in all the most popular scanner/tosser/packer software
packages.
I'm glad Squish does it.  :)



                                                ....Joe


--- Maximus/2 3.01