From: Mike '/m' 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:14:08 +0200, "Hrvoje Mesing"
 wrote:

>
>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>news:25ugj1psik6mb69ifo2vfg6u7fg5uapm43{at}4ax.com...
>
>> I have not been able to get Outlook to send an email to
>>
>>   email{at}[123.123.123.123]
>>
>> where 123.123.123.123 is the IP address of a email server, and 'email'
>> is a valid email account on that server.  I believe this is an RFC
>> requirement, just like proper SMTP handling.
>>
>> Also, I keep nicknames for my friends.  For example, I use bob-w for Bob
>> at work, Bob-h for Bob at home.  Well, Bob changed jobs, so I changed
>> the email address for Bob-w in the address book to his new email
>> address.  Unfortunately, Outlook also stores the email address somewhere
>> else, and insists on sending Bob-w emails to his old email address. I've
>> not found the other location in the address book or configuration
>> options yet.  I now have a NewBob-w entry in the address book to work
>> around this feature.
>>
>> Don't get me started on Outlook and IMAP....
>
>
>---
>
>Working as other services, like Fax [fax:....], etc.

I'm not sure what you're saying?



>This is because it have it's cache. You can reCheck your contact or clear
>overall cache.

I found out the file to delete to "clear the overall cache".  But
I, as a user, should not have to do that.  Shouldn't the cache just update
itself and get rid of the dirty data?

Do Microsoft's disk caches require the user to manually clean the dirty
data out of them or clean the overall cache?

  /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5