| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | steel |
On (01 Nov 98) Theo Bee wrote to Roy McNeill... TB> Going against established wisdom and it "is so simple stupid" TB> arguements is paramount to uphill battles and windmill fighting. It feels more like trying to stop a bulldozer by using cranial percussion. TB> Since playing Don Q is one of the things I enjoy doing to keep other TB> peoples brains flexible I decided to throw my bit of science in the pot TB> as well and give you a hand (sort of). TB> If you are right there obviously has to be a compensating mechanism, TB> I.e. on the surface it seems since the radius is obviously reduced there TB> have to be more axle revs for a given distance. One quibble: a deformed tyre is not a circle, so using the word "radius" is not correct. I think it's this "radius" concept that's given so many people the idea that I'm trying to quash. TB> However, the tyre is flattened over a wider area, not just at the point TB> of minimum radius. TB> For you to be right these extremities of contact with the road have TB> to be greater then the original radius, i.e. the tire needs to be TB> squared of a bit. That this is the case is easily seen, since it is TB> your arguement you can measure and report if the bulge at (two) TB> ends with increased radius will indeed compensate for the radius TB> reduction in the (one) center. I did look at that, but I'd need to make a funny jig or two to measure accurately the distance from the axle to the tyre edge. This would be especially tricky very close to where the rubber hits the road, because the bottom arm of the jig would have to be narrow enough to fit in the gap, but strong enough to do repeatable measurements accurate to a millimetre or two. Attaching this jig to the exact centre of the axle would be another problem, perhaps a small hole would have to be drilled in the hubcap (or bearing cover, in the case of the van I was using for the test). TB> Simply pullling the integral over the linear distance would solve it TB> conclusively. TB> QED, TB> don't thank me:-) Your father was a hamster, and your mother smelled of elderberries. Cheers --- PPoint 1.88* Origin: Silicon Heaven (3:712/610.16) SEEN-BY: 54/99 620/243 623/630 632/0 371 633/210 260 262 267 270 284 371 SEEN-BY: 634/397 635/506 728 639/252 640/820 670/218 711/410 430 948 963 964 SEEN-BY: 712/60 311 312 330 390 517 610 840 848 888 713/905 714/932 @PATH: 712/610 888 311 711/410 633/260 635/506 728 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.