| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: firewall configuration |
From: "Geo"
I don't mind the computer asking for an admin password before allowing
something, heck I set my firewall to require one to make any changes. What
I don't like is when I tell the computer to do something and it just flat
says no. Like when you use taskmanager to kill a task and it says
"denied". What, like I need some programmer to decide the
administrator has no right to terminate a process running on the machine?
That's like a car that says sorry, can't stop now you're in traffic as
opposed to just asking for a password before stopping.
Geo.
"Paul Ranson" wrote in message
news:4331751c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> So you're stuffed then.
>
> How is the OS supposed to tell the difference between you asking to do
> something and not expecting to get a password demand and some malware
you've
> allowed onto your machine where you do expect to get notified?
>
> Paul
>
> "Geo" wrote in message
news:4330c56b{at}w3.nls.net...
> > "Paul Ranson" wrote in message
> > news:43301505{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> Are you proposing a 'super administrator' priviledge to over come this?
> >
> > No, I'm suggesting that assuming the user is not running as admin is a
bad
> > assumption. In the business desktop world that may be valid but for the
> > home
> > machine I think it's a different mentality. For example, I don't care to
> > have my machine EVER tell me I don't have permissions to do something so
> > I'm
> > always running as administrator or root.
> >
> > Geo.
> >
> >
>
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.