SA>  GP> Why do you feel the antiChrist will come from among Jesus' blood
SA>  GP> brethren, when it seems clear from the texts that Rome was being
SA>  GP> named as the source?
SA>
SA> Texts such as Daniel 9:26 & 27 certainly seem to imply (and
quite strongly)

I was referring more to Xian Scriptures. . .

SA> that Rome is being named as the source. However, those who are preparing
SA> the way for the (fake) Moshiach are looking to a Jew, not a gentile - it
SA> is a reasonable assumption that the Sanhedrin will look to recognise a
SA> Jewish king as being the Messiah, as in...

There is NO Sanhedrin!

SA>     Another argument is that the rebuilding as postulated by
SA> Maimonides requires a certain order of events: 1) coming to the land;
SA> 2) appointment of a king from the house of David; 3) blotting out the
SA> descendants of Amalek; and only then 4) the building of the Temple.
SA> The counter argument claims that, while this is indeed the ideal order
SA> of events, the events themselves are not necessary mutually
SA> interdependent and one must carry out whichever is possible at the
SA> time. (Ref. 10)

Blotting out Amalek has been accomplished long ago, so you're saying that we're
only a building away from the eschatological End of this World?

Your friend,
<+]::-{)}  (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))


... nfx v3.1 down at the end of Lonely Street...in Heartbreak Hotel....      

--- EzyQwk V2.01b005 00F90260