From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_022C_01C76958.14A318A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   I use http://search.microsoft.com.  You should too.

Rich

  "Hrvoje Mesing"  wrote in message =
news:45fd7573{at}w3.nls.net...

  I didnt.
  I just said there is no info about the spec. reg key. The same =
remains.

  Maybe you have some super-dupper search enegine or Super internet =
Explorer=20
  .. seems you are special or something ..


  ---
  M.

  "Rich"  wrote in message news:45fa06d8{at}w3.nls.net...
     Then why did you lie when you said that you found what you were =
looking=20
  for by trying the same searches I tried and you claimed you tried?  =
All the=20
  searches I tried found what you searched for in the first few matches. =

  Something you appear to be lying about again.

     As for your other drivel, no where have you identified anything you =
found=20
  that isn't true.

  Rich

  "Hrvoje Mesing"  wrote in message=20
  news:45f9b913{at}w3.nls.net...
  No, you got it wrong again :)

  I said I searched a lot. I said I found the documentation. I said that =
I
  first found the "hint" (registry key name) on some other internet =
page. In
  process I found loads of info on MS pages that or isnt true, or is not
  working as expected or something else. I found the solution prior to =
MS
  page, but also confirmed it from MS page. There was no clue about =
solution
  on the microsoft site whatever the search request was.
  You are again inverting words/sentences to suit your needs.

  But Ok, lets say I found the solution.
  This is not saying MS docco. is any better. Of course today, when I =
was
  searching about some Windows Firewall and its Remote Administration =
futures
  I was quite impressed about few articles - also, some of them was =
"community
  additions".

  Have a beer on me.

  'njoy


  ---
  M.


  "Rich"  wrote in message news:45f87a3c{at}w3.nls.net...
     So you searched and found what you are looking for on =
microsoft.com.
  Sounds like the documentation worked for you.  Next time try to say
  something nice.

  Rich

  "Hrvoje Mesing"  wrote in message
  news:45f8723f{at}w3.nls.net...
  Hi,

  sorry, but you are bullshitting :)

  1. I am right. I know how to search
  2. I searched for what I mentioned, you mentioned and 2847582725 other
  things related to usb, securtiy, write protection, etc. That how I =
found the
  solution
  3. You only know how to invert other people words.
  4. MS documentation still sucks.
  5. There are too  much undocumented stuff, lousy documented, =
documented in
  iditoic way.
  6. I never ignore, but I sure do point {at} stupidity.
  7. Registry is not well documented
  8. Please stop being helpdesk|BOFH luser

  Enjoy,

  ---
  M.



  "Rich"  wrote in message news:45f762f5{at}w3.nls.net...
     You're right.  You don't know how to search.  For example, search =
for
  "usb disable" finds several items on how to disable USB storage =
devices.
  The registry setting you were whining about isn't to disable USB =
devices but
  to make them read-only.  You didn't try to search for that.  Searching =
for
  "usb read-only" finds several items on this topic.  All the searches =
you
  list result in pages that match the items for which you searched.  Do =
you
  expect it to ignore what you ask for and return matches to another =
topic?

     The registry is well documented.  If you expect to search this
  documentation you still need to identify for it is you are searching.  =
On a
  related note, if you add registry to the searches you claim to have
  attempted you get right to what you want without topics on these =
subjects
  that don't discuss the registry.  Try "usb security registry", "usb
  protection registry", "usb disable registry" or "protect usb =
registry".

  Rich

  "Hrvoje Mesing"  wrote in message
  news:45f7298f{at}w3.nls.net...
  Everything from securing external disks/drives, usb securtiy, usb
  protection, usb disable, selective usb usage, usb protection, protect =
usb,
  etc., etc., etc., etc., and I find more usable info on other Internet =
places
  then direct links to MS.

  Found info about registry key on some page, then found few articles =
(you
  mentioned, etc.) on MS.

  Think that would find it faster if registry keys are well documented - =
in
  example as were for win2K, but those were not complete, nor uptodate =
hives
  listed.

  Nevermind, I only know that Im in search about hundreds of small =
things
  about lots of network/domain/exchange environment on MS everyday and =
Im
  sometimes pretty pissed about smelly docco.

  My girl sings.

  Goto cup of tea.


  ---
  M.=20


------=_NextPart_000_022C_01C76958.14A318A0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   I use http://search.microsoft.com.&nbs" target="new">http://search.microsoft.com.&nbs=">http://search.microsoft.com">http://search.microsoft.com.&nbs=
p; You=20
should too.
 
Rich
 

  "Hrvoje Mesing" <Hrvoje.Mesing{at}zg.htnet.hr&g=">mailto:Hrvoje.Mesing{at}zg.htnet.hr">Hrvoje.Mesing{at}zg.htnet.hr&g=
t;=20
  wrote in message news:45fd7573{at}w3.nls.net...I=20
  didnt.I just said there is no info about the spec. reg key. The =
same=20
  remains.Maybe you have some super-dupper search enegine or =
Super=20
  internet Explorer .. seems you are special or something=20
 
..---M."Rich"
<{at}> wrote in message news:45fa06d8{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  Then why did you lie when you said that you found what you were =
looking=20
  for by trying the same searches I tried and you claimed you =
tried? =20
  All the searches I tried found what you searched for in the first =
few=20
  matches. Something you appear to be lying about =
again.  =20
  As for your other drivel, no where have you identified anything you =
found=20
  that isn't
true.Rich"Hrvoje Mesing"
<Milan{at}Milan.com>">mailto:Milan{at}Milan.com">Milan{at}Milan.com>
wrote in =
message news:45f9b913{at}w3.nls.net...No,
= you got=20
  it wrong again :)I said I searched a lot. I said I found the=20
  documentation. I said that Ifirst found the "hint"
(registry key =
name) on=20
  some other internet page. Inprocess I found loads of info on MS =
pages that=20
  or isnt true, or is notworking as expected or something else. I =
found the=20
  solution prior to MSpage, but also confirmed it from MS page. =
There was no=20
  clue about solutionon the microsoft site whatever the search =
request=20
  was.You are again inverting words/sentences to suit your =
needs.But=20
  Ok, lets say I found the solution.This is not saying MS docco. is =
any=20
  better. Of course today, when I wassearching about some Windows =
Firewall=20
  and its Remote Administration futuresI was quite impressed about =
few=20
  articles - also, some of them was =
"communityadditions".Have a beer=20
  on
me.'njoy---M."Rich"
<{at}> =
wrote in=20
  message news:45f87a3c{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  So you searched and found what you are looking for on =
microsoft.com.Sounds=20
  like the documentation worked for you.  Next time try to =
saysomething=20
  nice.Rich"Hrvoje
Mesing" <Milan{at}Milan.com>">mailto:Milan{at}Milan.com">Milan{at}Milan.com>
wrote in =
messagenews:45f8723f{at}w3.nls.net...Hi,<=
BR>sorry,=20
  but you are bullshitting :)1. I am right. I know how to =
search2. I=20
  searched for what I mentioned, you mentioned and 2847582725 =
otherthings=20
  related to usb, securtiy, write protection, etc. That how I found=20
  thesolution3. You only know how to invert other people =
words.4. MS=20
  documentation still sucks.5. There are too  much undocumented =
stuff,=20
  lousy documented, documented iniditoic way.6. I never ignore, =
but I=20
  sure do point {at} stupidity.7. Registry is not well
documented8. =
Please=20
  stop being helpdesk|BOFH=20
 
luserEnjoy,---M."Rich"
<{at}> =
wrote in=20
  message news:45f762f5{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  You're right.  You don't know how to search.  For example, =
search=20
  for"usb disable" finds several items on how to
disable USB storage =

  devices.The registry setting you were whining about isn't to =
disable USB=20
  devices butto make them read-only.  You didn't try to search =
for=20
  that.  Searching for"usb read-only" finds
several items on =
this=20
  topic.  All the searches youlist result in pages that match =
the items=20
  for which you searched.  Do youexpect it to ignore what you =
ask for=20
  and return matches to another
topic?   The registry =
is well=20
  documented.  If you expect to search thisdocumentation you =
still need=20
  to identify for it is you are searching.  On arelated note, =
if you=20
  add registry to the searches you claim to haveattempted you get =
right to=20
  what you want without topics on these subjectsthat don't discuss =
the=20
  registry.  Try "usb security registry",
"usbprotection =
registry",=20
  "usb disable registry" or "protect usb =
registry".Rich"Hrvoje=20
  Mesing" <Milan{at}Milan.com>">mailto:Milan{at}Milan.com">Milan{at}Milan.com>
=
wrote in=20
  messagenews:45f7298f{at}w3.nls.net...Ever=
ything=20
  from securing external disks/drives, usb securtiy, usbprotection, =
usb=20
  disable, selective usb usage, usb protection, protect usb,etc., =
etc.,=20
  etc., etc., and I find more usable info on other Internet =
placesthen=20
  direct links to MS.Found info about registry key on
some page, =
then=20
  found few articles (youmentioned, etc.) on
MS.Think that =
would=20
  find it faster if registry keys are well documented - inexample as =
were=20
  for win2K, but those were not complete, nor uptodate=20
  hiveslisted.Nevermind, I only know that Im
in search about =

  hundreds of small thingsabout lots of network/domain/exchange =
environment=20
  on MS everyday and Imsometimes pretty pissed about smelly =
docco.My=20
  girl sings.Goto cup of
tea.---M.=20


------=_NextPart_000_022C_01C76958.14A318A0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5