| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Outlook |
From: Gary Britt Except for a calendar shared across timezones. It only makes sense to schedule things based upon local time. At least to me. If I'm going to be on a conference call at X time. I enter the local time for me. The parties should translate timezones when setting up the meeting and each participant is responsible for putting down the right time for them on their local calendar. Someone mentioned shared calendars across timezones where there could be a problem, but for the life of me I can't imagine why somebody would want to share a calendar across timezones. Everybody keep there own calendar and is responsible for their own calendar seems to make the most sense to me. Its one thing to make the calendars viewable across timezones/offices but to make them actually shared seems a problem waiting to happen to me. Gary Rich wrote: > You would be wrong to schedule an 9:00 AM appt in CA as 9:00 AM EST. > You schedule it for 9:00 AM PST or 12:00 PM EST, the actual time of the > meeting. I do the former because it is clearer for me. Maybe it is > easier for you to think about a teleconference between you and someone > in CA where what is at 9:00 AM for some participants is at 12:00 PM for > you and others. > > Rich > > > "Gary Britt"* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.