JK> Yup.  And I also am very much aware that it has been guilty of 
misinformtio
JK> in the past.  There is another set of initials which is more grounded in 
th
JK> physical end of mental ILLNESS and is much more accurate.  There are, I 
JK> believe, a total of 4 initials in that name, but since I don't have it in 
JK> front of me, cannot say for certainty.
Please cite some of that "misinformation", and the subsequent information 
debunking it. 
The second place you're thinking of is probably NIMH.
You can't seem to say anything for certainty, especially since you can't seem 
to cite any reputable studies.
JK> I have also seen the publications from both outfits over the years.
Clearly not very frequently if you can't remember NIMH.
JK> So what?  This sounds vaguely reminisent of studies done for other 
conditio
JK> in the brain.  What is the causation?  Can it be affected by anything 
other
JK> than drugs?  And is it present in other diagnosed conditions also?
JK> 
JK> We are in an era where vagueness just won't cut it any longer.
This is true. Which is why these institutions report the findings from 
research, not vague extrapolations gleaned from anecdotal evidence posted on 
web sites by multi-level-marketers.
JK>  MP> Do you even know what NIH is? Do you have the slightest idea how
JK>  MP> someone  is appointed to the staff?
JK> 
JK> The entire system of "mental health" is a pyramid of insanity it itself 
at 
JK> times.  And appointment by one idiot for another idiot doesn't mean sicum 
i
JK> both idiots are coming from a premise that doesn't hold water.
In a word, no, she doesn't know.
--- GEcho 1.00
---------------