Hello Robert!

10 Sep 04 17:17, you wrote to me:

 RC>>> Excessively Annoying Behaviour is not relegated to the technical.

 RC|>> Social annoyances are not grounds for a PC.

 RC> Is that in Policy?  No seriously, is it?

For what policy does have in it, Scotts actions have to had to interfer
with the smooth operation of Mikes system...

Seems to me, Scotts actions had a bigger effect on himself, after all lets
look at this..

f10.n134.z1.nl.sysgod.org

SSSSSSSSSSSSSS PPPPPPPPPP

S = Secondary Domain

P = Primary Domain

When I try to resolve the whole string, my ISP's DNS servers determines the
IP address of the primary domain, in this case Scotts, then I meander down
to his system to make it thrash and tell me what the IP address is going to
be for the secondary.

Actually its his own system he is affecting..

Now when I simply use madmail.ods.org, my ISP DNS servers merely tell me
his IP and off I go, if I use Scotts method, I have to make an additional
hop to resolve his IP, once I have a trgetted URL's IP address, DNS is no
longer involved in the connection.

Be also mindful that:

madmail.ods.org

is a secondary under ods.org.

Translated, the only thing being impinged upon Mike is no one is bowing to his ego.

 RC|>> If you disagree, then Grant has said enough shit about the US
 RC|>> President to annoy the hell out of me, can I file a PC?

 RC> No.  He was not saying anything about /you./  So you are not harmed.
 RC> Not had he been slandering you, then I would say yes.

So every time a sysop insults another, name calling as an example, its
grounds for a PC?

==
Ross
ICQ: 5305939
Food For thought:
John Kerry Is Not Sargeant York!
... The backup's not over 'til the FAT table sings!
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-30512