0n (17 Sep 03) STEVE KEMP wrote to CINDY HAGLUND...

 SK> CH>SK> But I was but addressing Lee's assumption that Hill thought
 SK> that CH>SK> he was killing molesters.

 SK> CH>Have to see what Lee says. I thought Lee was reporting on what Hill
 SK> CH>had actually said rather than voicing his own opinion of what Hill
 SK> CH>said.

 SK> I suspect that Lee was speaking for himself and not reporting Hill's
 SK> opinion.

 SK> Lee will have to come up with some hard evidence that Hill thought he
 SK> was killing "molesters" and not "baby killers".
And I'm sure he'll
 SK> have a hard time doing so.

 SK> Any ways, Lee stated himself that "they are the same
thing", not that
 SK> "Hill said...".

 I missed that part. They certainly are not the same thing. Besides a
 a person isn't technically / legally 'alive' until they're born
 anyway. And besides all that, it's rather besides the point anyway
 what Hill really said or meant or what anybody thinks he meant, anymore.

 Lesson here is to always remember to suspect what someone _says_ someone
 else said or meant is probably an ASSumption. Especially if you
 happen to agree. This is what makes being skeptical so tricky.

 cindy


... Decaffeinated coffee? But...why?!

--- PPoint 3.01