JD> Hi Bob,


 JD> Now that you know what I ran into,  is there any hope 
 JD> of some sort of enhancement, whereby Squish -when 
 JD> handling netmail with the ATT bit and the In-Transit 
 JD> bit set -  can somehow decide if it needs to reduce a 
 JD> fully qualifed path down to just a filename.ext ?
...

Joe:

Thanks for documenting the issue.  We'll have to put this on the back
burner till we get a number of other issues resolved.  The basics of squish
are now running under Linux.  We still need some major cleanup of other
Maximus source code, and get SqaFix (for areafix capability) and a tick
type processor working.  

If you can figure out what needs to change in the code, we could probably
integrate it while we work on other things.  There probably needs to be a
config variable added so that Maximus and Squish can work together when the
sysop wants to send out a file attachment.  I've normally usesd just the
fully qualified file name, but I haven't tried to forward files -- only
send them direct to another system.....  An yes, normally I end up using
Bink or Squish to send the file direct with out a netmail attached.....

Hmmmm.....

Thanks for the info and notes.

Bob Jones, 1:343/41


--- Maximus/2 3.01