From: "Antti Kurenniemi" 

I don't think it's necessarily an improvement - I would have lowered the
limit to 1g or even less. People are storing their whole damn life in that
one single file now, and it really bothers me as it is dang difficult to
fix
& it is never backed up properly.


Antti Kurenniemi
(in a way, Outlook is too good a tool for many people)

"Geo"  wrote in message
news:43448168$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>I would consider removing a 2g limitation to be a significant improvement
>in
> what I thought was a pretty mature product.
>
> Geo.
>
> "Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
> news:g4j8k1llolslcjd9goijk86r90c1pgomm2{at}4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:15:47 +0300, "Antti Kurenniemi"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >Outlook prior to the latest 2003 versions had a 2G limit on the pst
>> >file,
>> >and I think even Outlook 2000 would allow it to go crash &
bang -full.
>>
>> Now there's a formula for success.  ;-)
>>
>> It is beginning to become more and more obvious that the good
>> programmers at Microsoft don't want to work on the Office products
>> anymore.  Lots of weird bugs surfacing that really shouldn't have gotten
>> out the door.
>>
>>  /m
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5